Science Communication in a formula O4Fb3S4

The Presentation inside:

Slide 0

Science Communication in a formula O4Fb3S4

Slide 1

The first element is for Obstacles

Slide 2

What people think of scientists What people know about science What scientists think about the public What language scientists use The 4 Obstacles to Science Communication

Slide 3

Obstacle #1 The Draw-a-Scientist Test Unvails a not too positive Stereotype of Scientist

Slide 4

Eccentric Bordering with madness Evil intent Middle-up class Masculine Socially inept Caucasian

Slide 5

Scientist is either a monster or a hero. The stereotype of scientist Needs to change. Scientists are professionals, normal people doing their job

Slide 6

Obstacle #2 The general level of scientific literacy Is quite low Look at what sort of questions Specialists make to get a sense of Scientific literacy

Slide 7

Slide 8

Elctrons smaller than atoms: true 47% Laser formed by sound waves: false 48% Continents drift: true 77% All radioactivity is human made: false 66% 17% refers to theory and experimentation

Slide 9

Obstacle #3 Scientists too represent an Obstacle To science communication

Slide 10

Scientists worry: public communication may badly affect career Scientists feel unable to communicate 3/4 scientists regard a lack of public knowledge, education or interest in science as a barrier 1/3 scientists see the media as a barrier, not a mean to reach out Few scientists participated to communication activities (public talks, speaking to media, open days, writing) Scientists fear speaking as death and void Scientists do not feel free to talk (pressures from leaders)

Slide 11

Obstacle #4 The language of science is obscure Scientific concepts are obscure To the public

Slide 12

Public finds scientific debate, uncertainty, risk confusing

Slide 13

Risk statistically contructed R = H x V Vs. socially contructed

Slide 14

What people think of scientists What people know about science What scientists think about the public Questions about language The 4 Obstacles to Science Communication

Slide 15

The second element is for Facebook

Slide 16

Facebook has three good rules for public engagement. See them as a metaphore for science communication

Slide 17

Fb on engagement: 1- Post video and pictures [in science communication: show people objects, people] 2- Ask questions [question their knowledge, their beliefs, challenge them] 3- Make offers [in science communication: invite them, visit them, prepare take home objects, let them understand you are offering something special]

Slide 18

The third element is for Speak

Slide 19

I generally refer to speak as speak out, reach out. Here, I focus on the act of speaking

Slide 20

My 4 Tips for Speaking out

Slide 21

Be Inspired Watch other speakers and analyse their speach. What was strong in their delivery? What was weak or unconvincing? What could you try on yourself? Watch, for example, TED speeches

Slide 22

Be Respectful Of your audience

Slide 23

Respect time - Be short Adults – some 30 minutes Kids – some 15 minutes

Slide 24

Be physical

Slide 25

Eyeballing Move Voice Stance

Slide 26

Be Organized Prepare an outline

Slide 27

Beginning Clarity Body Informative Interesting End Shortness

Slide 28

The safe way: Stand up Tell them what you are going to tell Tell them Tell them what you have told Sit down

Slide 29

Design the right pitch You may Tell a story Go personal Make a question „Rise a hand who…“ A dramatic data/statistic …summarize the talk

Slide 30

We retain 25% of a speech… Repeat Repeat Repeat …key messages

Slide 31

This is not a conclusion This is a bankrupt

Slide 32

Science Communication in a formula O4Fb3S4 Slides of a speach given at Dynamol meeting in Lion (2014) Jacopo Pasotti Website Follow me @medjaco