Ranking Signals of the Future A look at what inputs search engines may adopt in the future and how it impacts the marketing we do today.


The Presentation inside:

Slide 0

Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | [email protected] Ranking Signals of the Future A look at what inputs search engines may adopt in the future and how it impacts the marketing we do today.


Slide 1

Find These Slides Online at: bit.ly/futuresignals


Slide 2

#1 Usage Data of Pages and Sites


Slide 3

10,000 visits/day +50% growth last 6 months 3.7 pages/session 3 visits/unique user/month 6,000 visits/day -10% growth last 6 months 1.2 pages/session 1.4 visits/unique user/month


Slide 4

Maybe I should send searchers to the page w/ the greater visitor loyalty & engagement.


Slide 5

Patent, Analysis on SEO by the Sea


Slide 6

Ha!


Slide 7

This type of ranking input could be behind the strong performance of popular brand sites on queries where classic SEO elements are lacking Poor keyword targeting, crap relevance, few links, but the sites probably have stronger traffic/engagement than the competition.


Slide 8

Via Searchmetrics’ Ranking Factors Click-Through-Rate showed a 0.67 correlation This May Explain the High Correlation of CTR w/ Rankings


Slide 9

#2 Accuracy vs. Popularity of Information


Slide 10


Slide 11

Nailed It! Rank ‘em high, boys.


Slide 12

As Google’s research showed, PageRank and accuracy of information have a poor correlation on the web.


Slide 13

By looking at multiple sets of data across sites & pages, an algorithm could determine the consistency of accuracy shown by a site.


Slide 14

Paper from Google Researchers, Analysis by NPR


Slide 15

Consistently accurate facts could raise a site’s rankings, especially in areas (like health) where Google weights accuracy more heavily. Less likely to rank. More likely to rank.


Slide 16

#3 Query Structure as an Anchor-Text-Like Signal


Slide 17

Many searchers using query structures in a particular fashion could connect brands and modifiers to keywords


Slide 18

Looks familiar


Slide 19

Popular searches around a brand could indicate associations that manifest in ranking inputs.


Slide 20

That ranking might be at partially, causal, rather than mere coincidence.


Slide 21

#4 Brands as Entities, Entities as Answers


Slide 22

More and more brands are becoming entries in Google’s Knowledge Graph


Slide 23

IMO, these brand dropdowns suggest an implicit bias toward accumulating brand associations and showing them off to searchers


Slide 24

In many competitive SERPs, there seems to be a correlation between brand dropdowns and ranking higher.


Slide 25

Some brands get so tightly connected to keywords, they become nearly analogous with the query


Slide 26

Suggest also shows us brand queries that earn strong connections to URLs


Slide 27

Even some generic queries bring back branded domain suggestions


Slide 28

an experiment! Let’s try


Slide 29

Call Out Your Answer: What site would you expect to see when you searched for this?


Slide 30

Yup. Yup. Yup. Yup. Weird.


Slide 31

Call Out Your Answer: What site would you expect to see when you searched for this?


Slide 32

Yup. Yup. Yup. Yup. Yup. Yup. Yup.


Slide 33

Call Out Your Answer: What site would you expect to see when you searched for this?


Slide 34

Maybe? Yup. Yup. Yup. Maybe?


Slide 35

Call Out Your Answer: What site would you expect to see when you searched for this?


Slide 36

Maybe? Yup. Yup. Yup. Yup.


Slide 37

Best Way to Rank in 2018? “Yup.” Find a way to be the first on everyone’s mind.


Slide 38

#5 Tracing the Visit Path to an Answer


Slide 39

Problem-solving on the web often looks something like this: Broad search Narrower search Even narrower search Website visit Website visit Brand search Social validation Highly-specific search Type-in/direct visit Completion of Task


Slide 40

Google wants to do this: Broad search All the sites (or answers) you probably would have visited/sought along that path Completion of Task


Slide 41

If Google sees that many people who perform these types of queries:


Slide 42

Eventually end their queries on the topic after visiting: The Ramen Rater


Slide 43

They might use the clickstream data to help rank that site higher, even if it doesn’t have traditional ranking signals


Slide 44

They’re definitely getting and storing it.


Slide 45

Google was just granted an interesting patent that suggested a similar process Patent Application from Google, Analysis by Bill Slawski


Slide 46

#6 Weighting Elements of User Experience


Slide 47


Slide 48


Slide 49


Slide 50

Patent Application from Google, Analysis on SEOByTheSea Ever since Panda, Google’s been trying to surface not just quality content, but “high quality websites.”


Slide 51

If they aren’t already doing it, Google’s at least thinking about how to measure UX and rank sites that do it better, higher.


Slide 52

#7 Replacing Flawed Humans w/ Deep Learning Machines


Slide 53

Jeff Dean’s Slides on Deep Learning Are a Must Read for SEOs


Slide 54

Google’s Deep Learning system studied YouTube clips and eventually invented its own classification/concept of “cats”


Slide 55

Replace YouTube with the Web and cats with any given search query, and it’s not hard to imagine Google creating a deep learning ranking algorithm


Slide 56

Google knows there’s two, but based on my footprint, it biases to the one matching my behavior, past queries, geography, etc.


Slide 57

In the future, even Google’s search quality engineers may have no idea why something ranks or whether they’re using a particular factor in the ranking algorithm. The machine will simply ask “what algorithm produces results that searchers engage with best?” then make it.


Slide 58

strange path… Google seems to be going down a


Slide 59

Total searchers, number of searchers, & searches per searcher are all going up Via RKG’s Quarterly Digital Marketing Report


Slide 60

Is Google sacrificing ad impressions to make searchers happier?


Slide 61

Are they willing to take away queries that provide revenue? These searches could have created revenue, but Google’s pre-empting w/ direct navigation to URLs


Slide 62

I am too. Skeptical?


Slide 63

IMO, Google’s thinking long term. They want addicted searchers providing data about themselves so they can charge more per ad unit. Via Search Engine Land


Slide 64

Via RKG Report Facebook has shown Google that more data about users yields more dollars per impression and click.


Slide 65

I think Google will chase better UX to almost any extent in order to keep searchers & get data, even at the cost of their existing model. Almost unreal that Google does this w/o AirBnB paying for an ad. Via Tom Anthony’s Post


Slide 66

Google will chase better UX to almost any extent in order to keep searchers & get data, even at the cost of their existing model My Guess:


Slide 67

Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | [email protected] bit.ly/futuresignals


×

HTML:





Ссылка: