Collaboration and Cooperation

The Presentation inside:

Slide 0

Collaboration and Cooperation Stephen Downes National Research Council Canada May 22, 2014 Workshop on “Mass Collaboration and Education” Leibniz-Institut fur Wissensmedien Knowledge Media Research Centre Tubingen, Germany

Slide 1

Proposition… That mass collaboration, properly so-called, is not possible (or, to the extent that it is possible, it is so undesirable we would prefer to avoid it) And that instead we should be exploring mass cooperation as an alternative objective

Slide 2

The Evolution of Cooperation Robert Axelrod asks, "Under what conditions will cooperation emerge in a world of egoists without central authority?“ Pierre Dillenbourg: "In cooperation, partners split the work, solve sub-tasks individually and then assemble the partial results into the final output. In collaboration, partners do the work 'together'."

Slide 3

Stephanie D. Teasley and Jeremy Roschellel: "Collaboration is a coordinated, synchronous activity that is the result of a continued attempt to construct and maintain a shared conception of a problem... Cooperative work is accomplished by the division of labour among participants, as an activity where each person is responsible for a portion of the problem solving." What's important in collaboration is the creation of a shared model. "Our perspective has characterised collaboration as a process of constructing and maintaining a Joint Problem Space."

Slide 4

Let’s draw the distinction… When collaborating, people work together (co-labor) on a single shared goal. When cooperating, people perform together (co-operate) while working on selfish yet common goals. Heavily borrowed from

Slide 5

Collaboration The idea of shared goals, shared values… like an orchestra which follows a script everyone has agreed upon like a team playing a game against a common opponent

Slide 6

Cooperation The idea of separate goals interacting for mutual gain like a marketplace with competing but cooperating vendors like the internet

Slide 7

Slide 8

Collectives are breeding grounds for hierarchies and power struggles “Even with the best intentions, collaboration often encourages pyramids of power and authority. The higher up the pyramid you are in a collective, the more freedom you have to carve out your own individual identity and direct the group’s efforts towards your own goals.”

Slide 9

Wikipedia… Is a collective Everybody is working toward a common goal There’s one article on a topic which people create jointly Wikipedia’s ‘rules’ are essentially prerequisites for collaboration “neutral’ (ie., ‘group’) point of view Referencing = rule for dedising on content Hence the power struggles and hierarchies that have developed See, eg., ‘The Decline of Wikipedia’

Slide 10

Some (Post-Hoc) Antecedents Simmel’s (1890) distinction between ‘groups’ (defined by some membership criterion) and ‘webs of affiliation’ (linked through specific types of connections) ‘anticategorical imperative’ (Emirbayer and Goodwin, 1994) which rejects explanations of ‘social behavior as the result of individuals’ common possession of attributes and norms rather than as the result of their involvement in structural social relations’. See

Slide 11


Slide 12

Groups vs Networks = Collectives vs Connectives

Slide 13

Their Natures A collective is a collection of entities or members according to their nature; what defines a group is the quality members possess and number A connective is an association of entities or members via a set of connections; what defines a network is the extent and nature of this connectivity From

Slide 14

Elements and Ecologies A collective is elemental, defined by mass and sameness – like an ingot of metal (Aside: traditional democracy is a collective phenomenon) A connective is diverse and changing, defined by interactions – like an ecosystem Can we achieve order, responsibility, identity in an ecosystem? Do we need the iron hand? (Aside: Solon, learning, justice)

Slide 15

Collective Unity A collective must be cohesive, united, “out of many, one”… “the people, united, will never be defeated…” The melting pot… the encouragement is to conform, to be like the others Collective technology appeals to the mass: television, radio, newspapers, books Internet technology includes: all-staff email, corporate website, portal

Slide 16

Connective Diversity A connective, by contrast, thrives on diversity … “to each his own” … the salad bowl… the encouragement is to be distinct, to create Connective technology includes: talking, telephoning, writing letters, personal email Internet technology: personal home pages, blogs

Slide 17

Collective Coordination Collectives require coordination, a leader, someone who will show the way… and to be managed… a group will often be defined by its values (aka the leader’s values?) and then a way to get members to follow, to share the vision, will define standards - members belong to a collective Associated technology includes the Learning Management System, Learning Design, LOM, etc

Slide 18

Connective Autonomy Connectives require autonomy, that is, that each individual operate independently according to his or her own values and interests – cooperation entails mutual exchange of value rather than follower and leader – members interact with a network Associated technology: e-portfolios, personal learning environments

Slide 19

Collective Borders or Boundaries Collectives are closed - they require a boundary that defines members and non-members – walls - membership, logins and passwords, jargon and controlled vocabulary, lock-in (staying on-message, speak as one) Technology: enterprise computing, federated search, user IDs and passwords, copyrights, patents, trademarks, assertions of exclusivity

Slide 20

Connective Openness Connectives require that all entities be able to send and receive messages both (a) in their own way and (b) without being impeded In their own way: open source software, platform independence, APIs, RSS, communities of practice Without being impeded: Creative Commons and GPL, distributed identity

Slide 21

Collective Centralization Collectives are distributive – knowledge, information, money, etc., flows from the centre – an ‘authority’ and is distributed through to their members Collective knowledge is representationally based Ie., it is based in a symbol system And it required a (shared) semantics Associated technology: broadcast technologies, controlled vocabularies and ontologies

Slide 22

Connective Decentralization Connectivists are emergentist – knowledge is generated as a consequence of the interactions among members Connective knowledge is non-representational The knowledge is the structure; there is no requirement that the structure ‘stand for’ anything Interpretations of the structure are generated externally and are not inherent to the structure Relevant technology: tagging systems, ‘Page Rank’

Slide 23

Why Connectives? Nature of the knower: humans are more like connectives than collectives Quality of the knowledge: collectives are limited by the capacity of the leader Nature of the knowledge: collective knowledge is transmitted and simple (cause-effect, yes-no, etc) while network knowledge is emergent and complex

Slide 24

Harrison White. It's not an understatement to say that a lot of what I say here is anticipated years earlier in his work. "Social life is made up of endless chains and multiple overlapping nets, with no clear boundaries. It is long stings .... It is only a messy mesh or, rather, mush. Social reality is a terrain, a typology of networks and chains."

Slide 25

The MOOC Massive – by design Open – gratis and libre Online – not blended, not wrapped Courses – not communities, websites, video collections, etc

Slide 26

Massive Open Online Course Site A MOOC is a Web, not a Website

Slide 27

Design Principles Autonomy - Choice of contents - Personal learning - No curriculum Diversity - Multiple tools - Individual perspective - Varied content Openness - Open access - Open content - Open activities - Open assessment Interactivity - Encourage communication - Cooperative learning - Emergent knowledge

Slide 28

CCK08 2300 students

Slide 29

Connectivist MOOCs

Slide 30

Course Components The Daily

Slide 31

Course Components Managing Content

Slide 32

Course Components Feed Harvesting

Slide 33

Course Components OPML…

Slide 34

Course Components Intro…

Slide 35

The Students The Other Course Map…

Slide 36

The Students Wordle…[email protected]/

Slide 37

The Students Google Groups

Slide 38

The Students Translations…

Slide 39

The Students Second Life… Diigo… WordPress…

Slide 40

2800 students 1800 students 3000 students Other Courses

Slide 41

Most Recently MOOC REL 2014

Slide 42

Personal Learning

Slide 43

The Student’s Perspective Site A range of different resources and services

Slide 44

LPSS core technologies

Slide 45

Learning and Performance Support

Slide 46

Core Lessons Here… That, as I said, mass collaboration is either impossible or undesirable Which should lead you to question whether studies of eg. Wikipedia will take you to the places you want to go And I’ve identified cooperation as an alternative model Especially as a model of organization But additionally as a model of learning Which has been tried and resulted in MOOCs

Slide 47

Stephen Downes